This is not currently part of the peer-reviewed material of the project. Do not cite as a research publication.
The review process for the database is currently in development. The following components are envisaged:
1. Review commentary facility: this is a table which can link to entries in the database with a field for comments, the reviewer’s name, a recommendation (revise, reject, publish, etc.) and, importantly, visibility options (visible to reviewer only (notes), visible to editor(s), visible to author, visible to all). Currently mostly implemented, using the ‘review’ table.
2. Review request facility: a table (perhaps also ‘review’ table) which allows authors to submit a work for review and/or editors to request a review from a particular reviewer.
3. Review report facilities for relevant tables (sources, narratives, mss, etc.), including: